Operating at the cutting edge of one of the world’s biggest long-term challenges, the quest for longer, healthier lives, the health care sector offers an interesting mix of challenge and opportunity from an ESG perspective.

Healthcare companies operate at the cutting edge of one of the world’s biggest long-term challenges –  the quest for longer, better life. On the one hand they are well positioned to help promote good health and well-being. But on the other, the industry faces criticism over some of its business practices, especially in terms of product safety, marketing and price fixing.

Below, we take a look at what we believe are the primary environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks and opportunities to consider when assessing the healthcare sector.


Environmental considerations generally have a limited impact on the performance of healthcare stocks.  But this is largely because healthcare firms tend to have a limited impact on the environment. As a result, environmental factors tend to have a fairly low weighting in our assessment.[1] That said, some companies have significant agrochemical and broader chemical activities, which can have a high impact on the environment such as soil depletion, water contamination and biodiversity loss.

Read more: The world is losing the war against climate change

The risk of health issues linked to the production and usage of controversial products like pesticides is another worry. There is also growing concern over the impact of pharmaceutical residues that are increasingly being found in food for human consumption as a result of air, soil and water contamination. Likewise, the release of antibiotic effluents into rivers also contributes to a particular topic of interest, namely antimicrobial resistance.

Social issues

At the heart of the ESG equation in the healthcare sector, is the impact its products have on human health and well-being. This equation covers everything from the unintended side-effects of medicines and product safety as well as quality, to improper marketing practices, affordability concerns and access to healthcare.

Safety track records among major healthcare companies have improved in recent years, and this has gone a long way to help minimise harm. However some firms still present particular issues in terms of recalls and warning letters.

Read more: Diversity in-depth: An interview with McKinsey’s Dame Vivian Hunt

Pharmaceutical companies also face risks related to the illegal or inappropriate marketing of their products, which can impact patient safety. Most marketing litigation occurs in the US where both direct-to-customer advertising of prescription drugs and class-action lawsuits are permitted. While there has been an overall decrease in litigation costs in recent years, some corporations are clearly more exposed than others.

How companies take affordability into account is a topic of growing concern. It is also one that has captured headlines and imaginations in recent years, especially in the US. The first significant price controversy began in 2014 in the US and since then both public and political pressure have increased. In 2015, when then US Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said she intended to cap prescription drug bills for those who were chronically ill, the value of biotech stocks fell quickly and hard. Since then several companies have made progress toward pricing transparency and differentiated pricing strategies. Nevertheless, we believe much still remains to be done.

Access to healthcare needs to be considered more broadly. From an opportunity point of view, when considering access to markets and market share developments, access to medicine may be a great way to unlock potential growth in emerging markets. In traditional markets, healthcare companies are facing ever decreasing returns on research and development investment, as well as higher pricing pressures. In the coming years healthcare companies’ growth should come from developing markets and firms with the strongest access-to-medicine  programmes are the most likely to benefit.

Read more: Made in China 2.0: The digital economy drive

Given the importance of innovation to the performance of healthcare companies, we give particular weight to the human capital factor in our assessment. Maintaining knowledge and ensuring innovation capacities are key issues, especially in the context of merger and acquisition activity and company restructuring. Having an appropriate talent attraction and retention strategy is crucial to ensuring that a company has the appropriate number of skilled people to achieve its innovation ambitions. But as these are highly specialised skills, competition for talent is huge. And, as such, recruiting and retaining the best talent is key to driving innovation and value in R&D-intense companies.

That said, from an impact perspective, we do need to question to what extend these companies are allocating resources to the world’s most pressing health challenges and how efficient those allocations are.

Governance issues

Within an industry where product development can take over a decade, long-term strategy is crucial. We therefore try to assess a management team’s long-term positioning with regards to R&D intensity, broader market megatrends as well as its M&A strategy. We also look at executives’ track records, especially regarding ESG issues and any potential related controversies.

Remuneration is another issue of particular interest for the healthcare industry. As an illustration of shareholder dissatisfaction with pay practices, 22% of pharmaceutical companies in the MSCI All Companies World Index have faced a negative vote in excess of 10% on their pay policies and practices, according to the latest MSCI Industry Report on Pharmaceuticals. .[2]

[1] Environmental issues weight for 10% of the ESG score

[2] MSCI Industry Report / Pharmaceuticals / January 2018